In class, we've talked a lot about the presidential candidates trying to relate to the general americans. Generally, politicians try to speak in a way, that will attract the demographics that they think are likely to vote for them. This New York Times article, points out Romney's distinctive language. Romney uses what the author of this article calls "Romneyspeak." "In Romneyspeak, passengers do not get off airplanes, they “disembark.” People do not laugh, they “guffaw.” Criminals do not go to jail, they land in the “big house.” Insults are not hurled, “brickbats” are." Romney uses very polite formal language, and the author of this article suggests that his language sets him apart from many Americans.
I agree with the author that his language definitely keeps him removed from many Americans. He already is not very relatable to many Americans because of his extreme wealth and power, and I think his language sets him apart even more. Its almost as if he's set himself upon a pedestal. It almost seems like he thinks he is too good to speak like average Americans speak.
What do you think? Do you think Mitt Romney's language is a disadvantage to his campaign?
Rachel i see where you are coming from with this. It does seem like Romney is distant and unrelatable to the common public. I don't necessarily agree with the fact he is on a pedestal. I honestly just think Romney is in his own little world, not that he is too good for everyone else. I don't think anyone really picks their sayings. They are just habit. For instance, in Chicago we call parking garages just that. A few hours North, Minnesota residents call them "Ramps." Maybe Romney's sayings are a product of his high-class upbringing which would distance himself more, but it is not a conscious decision on his part.
ReplyDeleteI think that in some way both Obama and Romney are trying to get voters to like them through the way they speak, but I don't think it's hurting their campaigns. I think that as much as either of the candidates try to make themselves more like the "average American" they simply aren't. They're both extremely well-educated men who probably just speak that way out of habit. I agree with what Matt said about how people speak in Chicago vs Minnesota also. In my opinion, it's like how some people say "pop" instead of "soda." You can't really help it- it's just the way you've always said it. But mostly I think it's Mitt Romney's upbringing and because most people in politics talk the same way he does.
ReplyDeleteMatt, although demographics may play a part in his word choices, I do feel that there may be a strategic aspect to his choices. Although a relatable candidate to the American public may be effective, I also think that an individual who displays impressive vocabulary draws appeal as well. Romney, in my opinion, chooses more extravagant words in dialogue to impress and inspire trust amongst prospective voters. Personally, I always am drawn to individuals who display vocabulary prowess, believing that vocabulary reflects high education and ability. Other Americans may have different opinions, but I for one think that Romney's vocabulary choice can benefit his campaign.
ReplyDelete